A
sad day for America. I never thought I would see this day. You can now be
arrested in America for what you say, think and believe. This is OBAMA’s
Amerika.
Middle Eastern Christian arrested in
the USA for violating Sharia “Blasphemy” laws.
Now the oppressed people of the world know that America is not a place
to flee to in order to find freedom. There is no longer ANY escape from the
long arm of Islamic fanaticism.
This Coptic Christian was dragged out
by police in the middle of the night because he violated Islam’s Sharia law by
“insulting the prophet” and was taken into police custody. Law enforcement and
the news media exposed his identity because they want terrorists to find and
kill his for questioning Islam.
From USA TODAY: “We must have laws against questioning Islam in
America and those who criticize Islam must be arrested” by Anthea Butler-associate professor of religious studies at the
University of Pennsylvania.
[NOTE: Originally the producer and
director of the movie “Innocence of Muslims” was believed to be a Sam Bacile.] Words have consequences. I know that
because one of my tweets asking "when Sam Bacile would be arrested"
drew wide attention on Wednesday. My initial tweet about Bacile, the person said to be responsible
for the film mocking the prophet Mohammed, was not because I am against the
First Amendment. My tweets reflected my exasperation that as a religion
professor, it is difficult to teach the facts when movies such as Bacile's Innocence
of Muslims are taken as both truth and propaganda, and used against
innocent Americans. If there is anyone
who values free speech, it is a tenured professor! So why did I tweet that
Bacile should be in jail? The "free speech" in Bacile's film is not
about expressing a personal opinion about Islam. It denigrates the religion by
depicting the faith's founder in several ludicrous and historically inaccurate
scenes to incite and inflame viewers. Even the film's actors say they were
duped. Bacile's movie is not the first to denigrate a religious figure, nor
will it be the last. The Last
Temptation of Christ
was protested vigorously. The difference is that Bacile indirectly and
inadvertently inflamed people half a world away, resulting in the deaths of U.S. Embassy personnel. Bacile's movie does not excuse the
rioting in Libya and Egypt, or the murder of Americans. That is deplorable.
Unfortunately, people like Bacile and Terry Jones, the Florida pastor who provoked international
controversy by burning copies of the Quran, have a tremendous impact on
religious tolerance and U.S. foreign policy. Case in point: Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called Jones on Wednesday to ask him to stop
promoting Bacile's film. Clearly, the military considers the film a serious
threat to national security. If the military takes it seriously, there should
be consequences for putting American lives at risk. While the First Amendment
right to free expression is important, it is also important to remember that
other countries and cultures do not have to understand or respect our right. My
condolences and prayers go out to the families of the U.S. Embassy employees
killed in Libya.
My commentary: Colleges and universities are the places most
hostile to free speech in America-with their politically correct speech codes.
This was discussed in a recent edition of this newsletter. This points out
another important fact-liberal and Obama suck-ups in the military. After the
Fort Hood terrorist attack –the general was more concerned about maintaining
“diversity” than he was about the loss of the lives of our soldiers. These
jerks are Obama appointees who carry out his anti-American agenda.
Obama called Google and
asked them to remove the 15 minute excerpts from “Desert Warriors/The Innocence
of Islam.” So here we have the state arresting citizens for the crime of free
speech and carrying out censorship. Supposedly, the video is still up-but I
can’t find it. It bothers me that one company-Google, which is a radical
leftist company that attacks and disparages conservatives on its search
engine-I have seen this myself-now owns YouTube. This means censorship can be
carried out as a matter of corporate policy. Some of the scenes in “Innocence of
Muslims” were satirical-however, other scenes were not “historically
inaccurate” but were rather accurate portrayals of the life of Mohammed derived
from history and Islamic sources.
NEWS STORY: “Sam Bacile”
As outrage over the anti-Muslim film "Innocence of
Muslims" spreads across the Middle East, police were sent to the
California home of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the film's producer, who according
to authorities is frightened for his life. Sheriff's deputies were sent to the
Cerritos, California home of Nakoula, 55, Thursday to protect him and his
family, a senior law enforcement official told ABC News. According to a
sheriff, the police were at Nakoula's home overnight Thursday but have now
left, as media reports identifying him as the man behind "Innocence of
Muslims," and listing his address, have circulated. According to
California law enforcement officials, Nakoula, who is also known to authorities
as Bacily Nakoula, was frightened for his life and "scared of
retaliation" against his family. Sheriffs from the Cerritos police station
were sent to his home to keep Nakoula safe and to provide a uniformed presence
to assist the members from the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, official reports
said. Nakoula told the Associated Press in an interview outside Los Angeles
that he was manager for the company that produced "Innocence of
Muslims." He denied he directed the film and said he knew the
self-described filmmaker, identified only as "Sam Bacile." But the
cell phone number that the AP contacted Tuesday to reach the filmmaker who
identified himself as "Bacile" traced to the same Southern California
address where the AP found Nakoula. A senior official said that they also had
sent local law enforcement officers to the production company "Media for
Christ" in Duarte, California to keep watch on the facility, which
authorities said was affiliated with making the film that has been a trigger
for anti-U.S. violence and protest in several countries. Nakoula pleaded no
contest in 2010 to federal bank fraud charges in California and was ordered to
pay more than $790,000 in restitution and serve 21 months in prison. Outrage
over the "Innocence of Muslims" film has spread across the Middle
East as protesters have rushed the U.S. Embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, while further
demonstrations broke out outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. On Tuesday,
protesters in Cairo, Egypt, scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy and tore down
the American flag in an angry demonstration against the film that depicts the
founder of Islam as a fraud and a womanizer.
President Obama, stop blaming the victim for Mideast violence by Kirsten Powers
"Disgusting and reprehensible." said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "Truly abhorrent," an outraged White House official told an international conference. Were they talking about the murder of four Americans in Libya? Or perhaps the hoisting of an Islamist flag over the U.S. Embassy in Cairo? No. For that they stuck to diplomatic speak. For the president, the harshest language was: "I strongly condemn the outrageous attack." For Clinton it was that the US is heartbroken and she condemned "this senseless act of violence." But "disgusting and reprehensible" and "truly abhorrent " were reserved for an amateurish and silly film by someone nobody has ever heard of. In fact, what is "disgusting and reprehensible" is that there are people in the world who think they are justified in attacking and killing people because someone hurt their feelings or offended their sensibilities. The US government should not act as a validator or enabler of this upside down worldview, which is exactly what the Obama administration has done repeatedly as they have responded to these abhorrent attacks against the United States. I have defended the Obama administration against the complaints from the right that they have run an "apology tour" in the Middle East because I believe the US should admit when we make mistakes, such as the accidental burning of Korans. But what we shouldn't do is affirm the wrongheaded view that people should be protected from the free speech of others.
"Disgusting and reprehensible." said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "Truly abhorrent," an outraged White House official told an international conference. Were they talking about the murder of four Americans in Libya? Or perhaps the hoisting of an Islamist flag over the U.S. Embassy in Cairo? No. For that they stuck to diplomatic speak. For the president, the harshest language was: "I strongly condemn the outrageous attack." For Clinton it was that the US is heartbroken and she condemned "this senseless act of violence." But "disgusting and reprehensible" and "truly abhorrent " were reserved for an amateurish and silly film by someone nobody has ever heard of. In fact, what is "disgusting and reprehensible" is that there are people in the world who think they are justified in attacking and killing people because someone hurt their feelings or offended their sensibilities. The US government should not act as a validator or enabler of this upside down worldview, which is exactly what the Obama administration has done repeatedly as they have responded to these abhorrent attacks against the United States. I have defended the Obama administration against the complaints from the right that they have run an "apology tour" in the Middle East because I believe the US should admit when we make mistakes, such as the accidental burning of Korans. But what we shouldn't do is affirm the wrongheaded view that people should be protected from the free speech of others.
Worse, our leaders shouldn't let our enemies know that when they
kill our people and attack our embassies that the US Government will act like a
battered wife making excuses for her psychotic husband. Wake up: we weren't
attacked because of a movie made by an American. We were attacked because there
are crazy religious fanatics who hate the United States. We didn't ask for it.
Egypt's President Morsi reportedly asked Obama "to put an end to such
behavior"—presumably freedom, constitutional rights and the like -- as it
led to the making of, in his eyes, the offensive movie. Obama has no legal
recourse but our president seems to be acquiescing to Morsi’s request by trying
to silence the movie-maker through verbal intimidation, including a call from
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Dempsey who asked Pastor Terry Jones to withdraw
his support
for the
film. Additionally, The
Hollywood Reporter
reveals
that the FBI was dispatched to Hollywood to uncover the identity of the
filmmaker. (Don't they have real terrorists to catch? I'll be looking for the
administration's condemnations next for the selling of the DVD of “The Da Vinci
Code,” the blockbuster American movie that claims Jesus had sex with Mary
Magdalene.) Team Obama’s unseemly groveling to violent extremists has been
cloaked in a newfound concern on the left for respecting religious
sensibilities. Tuesday, a liberal professor argued in USA Today that the maker
of the Mohammed film should be arrested.
President Obama said in the Rose Garden: "We reject all efforts to
denigrate the religious beliefs of others" and Clinton asserted that,
"The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the
religious beliefs of others." Deputy National Security Adviser Denis
McDonough endorsed efforts to create "a world where the dignity of all
people—and all faiths—is respected." Apparently our foreign policy is now
being run by Dr. Phil. Someone needs to explain to the White House that our
Constitution protects freedom of religion from government interference, not the
protection from people who say mean, critical or offensive things about one's
religion. But if this is truly their new position, then they have a lot to be
outraged about right here at home. Remember Amanda Marcotte, one of the left's
top bloggers and a columnist for the left-wing Guardian who chose last Easter
-- the holiest day of the Christian calendar -- to chime "Happy Jeebus
Day"? She once asked: "What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord
filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit? [Answer]: You’d have to
justify your misogyny with another ancient mythology." Then there was the
tweet last year by Bill Maher about Tim Tebow during a particularly bad game:
"Wow, Jesus just f----- #TimTebow bad! And on Xmas Eve! Somewhere in hell Satan
is Tebowing,
saying to
Hitler "Hey, Buffalo's killing them." This was so offensive that
President Obama's PAC still managed to take a million dollars from this man to
help finance his reelection. If Christians had burned down Maher's house in
response, would the administration put out a statement condemning the violence
but pointing out that he should have respected the religious beliefs of
others? Of course not. Nor would anyone
want that. But that is what the administration keeps doing with their responses
to the attacks in the Middle East. The condemnations are paired in with claims
about respecting religious beliefs, which is implicit sympathy for the claims
of some of the attackers and rioters. It’s time for the Obama administration to
stop blaming the victim. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/14/president-obama-stop-blaming-victim-for-mideast-violence/?intcmp=trending#ixzz26jtUboFe
The
Five on “The Innocence of Muslims” http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/the-five/transcript/should-hollywood-defend-anti-muslim-film
GREG GUTFELD, CO-HOST: So, the
U.S. and Hezbollah finally agreed it's our fault, not theirs. But this rush to
blame what's been called the U.S.-made film raises some question like where is
Alec Baldwin? Why is he so quiet? Isn't freedom of expression the default
cocktail chatter of the Hollywood artiste? Chances are, the only way to get
Hollywood to defend the filmmaker would be if he's suddenly did a sequel
showing that Christians kidnapped orphans for food. But if you think art can
make people kill, then shouldn't you support art control? Carrying a concealed
haiku would require a license. How about a five-day waiting period for tasteful
etchings? See, this isn't about the acts of terror but a response to them.
Blaming that video for unrest is like blaming the Fort Hood massacre on the
workplace violence. It's moral cowardice. A refusal to confront our enemies
because then you must reject your own assumptions about evil America. Repeat
after me -- it's them, not us, which runs counter to teacher lounge logic that
stains the White House. If it's our fault, why aren't the Muslims rioting in
the U.S.? Maybe because our government doesn't orchestrate it. Only the media
would think Mitt Romney's response is scarier than our appeasement. This is not
war for Islam's hearts and minds, but for our lungs and kidneys. We cannot
forfeit our Western principles to appease haters. But it's the media, the
champions of free expression doing just that. They track the filmmaker down and
justify the anti-West outrage on heels of romanticizing its sister scam, Occupy
Wall Street. And why? Because it's all they know. Cultivated on the college
campus, the only thing that stuck was a disgust for American strength.
There's a reason Bill Ayers never bombed a college. Those were his
hearts and minds.
ERIC BOLLING, CO-HOST: Nice.
Great analogy. GUTFELD:
Where is the ACLU? (CROSSTALK)
GUTFELD: Respond with facts. Don't ask me --BOB BECKEL, CO-HOST:
All right. When you say college campuses and teacher lounge, you're assuming
that all college campuses are appeasers? GUTFELD:
Eighty percent of college campuses are overwhelmingly liberal. The professors
have tenure, allowing them to profess ideas that no real American would even
care about. The anti-Americanism is born in universities. That's where it comes
from. And it bleeds into the government civil servants, and that's why we have
this now. There's nobody in the White House, there's nobody in academic who
actually thinks our government is not at fault. BECKEL: But you are suggesting that
bureaucrats who work for government are anti-American? GUTFELD: No. I'm
saying that they were born and bred in an environment which taught them that
way. Most professors, study show, are overwhelmingly left wing. This is where
you get the attitude. ANDREA
TANTAROS, CO-HOST: Which is so fascinating because the media
that makes a living and is supposed to be embracing free speech is somehow
apologizing for it, which I find to be very, very --DANA PERINO, CO-HOST:
The Hollywood non-response is bizarre. They talk about everything all the time.
All of a sudden, they've gone mute. GUTFELD:
Yes. PERINO:
Which is more telling than anything they --GUTFELD: And actually kind of a relief.
It's nice not to hear
from them.
BOLLING: I don't want to cut you off. Can we
throw the picture up of the filmmaker again? We saw like in disguise and the
cops are leading him out.
To
me, America changed.
PERINO: I agree.
BOLLING: Someone e-mailed that picture. Mark
Levin actually sent this to me. Take a look at this. America changed at that
moment. To use what is called a flimsy ploy to bring a guy in for questioning,
proves that the Obama administration, through all his appeasement and the
apologizing, answers to the Koran first and to the Constitution second.
BECKEL: Oh, c'mon. That's just outrageous statement.
Even for you that's outrageous statement. (CROSSTALK) BECKEL: Of all the things you
said and I love you, brother, but that's the most outrageous thing you have
said! BOLLING:
Why was he brought in? (CROSSTALK)
BECKEL: He was brought in because he's investigated for parole
dumping, that's why. (CROSSTALK)
GUTFELD: Suddenly, they find his parole. BECKEL: I agree with
that. But I'll tell you one thing, if he had any sense -- this is a guy who's
apparently a Coptic Christian. I can understand why they're outraged because --GUTFELD: You defended
them. BECKEL:
That's right. I have. But that does not
mean that I would have suggested to him that they put together a film like this
that was bound to incite an incitable group of people. GUTFELD: He should do
anything he wants. If he wants to make a movie --PERINO: How many high
school students tried to put together this weekend a movie more outrageous than
that one? Then what are we going to do? Call in, everybody? GUTFELD: By the way,
you only incite more violence if you prove to them that violence works. OK,
we're going to apologize and they know by killing Americans, this is how you
shut Americans. TANTAROS:
Or that it's wrong. They say, look, the administration is actually agreeing
with us. PERINO:
And they can go back to the coffee clutches and say, see, we got America to
arrest the guy. That's the picture. Do you think -- this is the -- this is the
picture all over the Middle East today. GUTFELD:
Yes. (CROSSTALK) GUTFELD:
I got to tell you -- I love the New York Post. They are opened by our parent
company. But this ticks me off. Sunday, I buy The Post and drink coffee, they
have "Cinemaniac." And they probably did this because they love the
headline. But this is so bogus. I mean, they say he -- this is the loon who set
fire to Muslim world. No, the Muslim set fire to Muslim world. TANTAROS: They need
this excuse, because don't forget, this is embarrassing to the administration.
Al Qaeda had better intelligence than we did. And eight weeks before a
presidential election, it's successful terrorist attack when we drop the ball
does not look good for the president. That's why they keep making an issue of
this video. Lame. BECKEL:
We want to encourage people with the free speech they want. But listen, in a
reasonable world, would we want to encourage people to do this film when we
know the results --PERINO:
No one encouraged him.BOLLING:
Hold on. GUTFELD:
I'm reasonable. You can't be unreasonable.
PERINO:
I think that the administration should demand that Sony cancel the release of
the killing bin Laden film or else you don't know what's going to happen. GUTFELD: It's a good
point. PERINO:
How many Americans could die after that? BOLLING:
If you tell that man he or anybody else can't make a film like this Muslim --BECKEL: Nobody said --
I didn't say he couldn't make it. (CROSSTALK)
BOLLING: Shouldn't. BECKEL:
Shouldn't. I don't think he should have. BOLLING:
That's right. BECKEL:
Of course he has the right to do it. But that doesn't mean that you also have
the right, I guess, to yell "fire" in a theater. PERINO: You have a
right to protest but you don't have a right to kill American ambassadors. GUTFELD: You know what
the parallel is? The parallel is building the mosque near the World Trade
Center. You can do that. It's kind of a bad move. You kind of suck for doing
it. It's the same thing with this. You can make the video. Kind of a jerk. But
you can make the video. That's the way it works. TANTAROS: You have the
right, but it doesn't make it right. BECKEL:
That's right. We have come to agreement on that. GUTFELD: But it didn't
spark anything. The only thing that sparks violence is our way of life. That's
it. BECKEL:
Something else would have sparked it. To see it across 20 countries at one time
--TANTAROS:
They don't need a spark. BECKEL:
Why weren't they doing something a month ago? TANTAROS: They ran planes in to our World
Trade Center. BECKEL:
No, I'm not talking about the last two or three --TANTAROS: They don't
need an excuse. GUTFELD:
Bruce Springsteen is dancing in the dark. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/the-five/transcript/should-hollywood-defend-anti-muslim-film#ixzz26vCiatyc
Sean Hannity on the 2012 9-11 attacks
SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And as
anti-American protests spread, this administration is trying to deflect blame
for its failed policies and trying to peg all of this violence on a YouTube
video. I know, believe it or not. Watch this. JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY:
This is a fairly volatile situation. And it is in response, not to the United
States policy, not to -- obviously the administration, not to the American
people. It is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be
reprehensible and disgusting. That in no way justifies any violent reaction to
it. But this is not a case of protests directed at the United States, at large
or at U.S. policy. This is in response to a video that is offensive and -- to
Muslims. HANNITY:
Now, that comment is just pathetic and it pretty much says it all. We are
dealing with an administration that does not have the courage to stand up for
this country. We have a president who is operating from a position of weakness,
a president who refuses to call people what they are, in this case, radical
extremists, Islamists. And speaking of that video, the president's indifference
to a little something that we call free speech.
Now, Fox News has confirmed that the White House has asked YouTube
to, quote, "review the trailer." Now, that sounds an awful lot like
an administration strong-arming a private company. Why? To censor its content.
But tonight, we have learned that Google, who owns YouTube, will not remove
this clip. So, how do we get to this frightening point?
Now, I believe think it all began with this president constantly
apologizing for America, his efforts to appease the mobs, his willingness to
reason with malevolent forces that are in fact committed to killing us. Now,
let's take a look back to 2009, when he spoke in Cairo in the very same city
that you are seeing right here tonight, where Islamists are chanting
"Death to America." Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, JUNE 4, 2009) PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
I'm grateful for your hospitality and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. I
am also proud to carry with me the good will of the American people and a
greeting of peace for Muslim communities in my country. Assalaamu alaykum. (CHEERS
AND APPLAUSE) OBAMA:
9/11 was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked
was understandable. But in some cases, it led us to act contrary for our
traditions and our ideals. We are taking concrete actions to change course. I
have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States and I
have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year. (END VIDEO
CLIP) HANNITY:
Mr. President, EIT, enhanced interrogation, is not torture. Without EIT,
without Gitmo, you don't get the call to go after bin Laden. And this was a
dangerous display of weakness. And we are now seeing the fruits of this
reckless rhetoric. Here with reaction of the latest developments, syndicated
columnist, Fox News contributor, our friend, Charles Krauthammer. Charles,
welcome back. CHARLES
KRAUTHAMMER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: Happy to be here. HANNITY: I loved your
line, we should have as the United States, told them to go straight to hell. We
didn't. Where does it stand now? KRAUTHAMMER:
Well, I think what you're seeing in those things you've quoted from Carney and
the administration. "This has nothing to do with us or our policies, it's
about a video," is either willfully obtuse or simply clueless. What has
happened is, as you pointed out, beginning with the Cairo speech, Obama changed
American policy on the theory that the reason that people hated us was because
we were tough. They hated us because of Iraq, they hated us because of
Guantanamo. They hated us because of the torture -- he used the word, he
accuses his own country abroad of torturing. And he was now apologizing and
promising to change course. We would no longer be tough. We would be loved. We
would show compassion. And we would get out of Iraq. He sets a deadline for
Afghanistan. He doesn't support the green revolution in Iran. He shows the
ayatollahs tremendous respect. He essentially protects them when they are under
attack. He gets nowhere on the Iran nuclear issue. He is equivocal uncertain
during the Arab Spring. He leads from behind in Libya. The theory was if we go
soft, if we are very nice, if we -- if we say Assalaamu alaykum, enough times,
everything will be all right. And what he decided is, the way to do that, the
theory and therefore the practice is going to be, retreat and withdraw.
Remember the line he uses? The tide of war is receding. HANNITY: Not exactly.
KRAUTHAMMER: That means the tide of
American power is receding. And the reason that American interests, embassies,
schools, businesses are aflame throughout the Middle East from Tunis all the
way to South Asia is because things don't happen in a vacuum. And when you
withdraw the power and the influence of the strongest country on earth from a
region, the vacuum will be filled. HANNITY:
Great point. KRAUTHAMMER:
What we are seeing now is the Salafists, the Islamist, understanding this is
their opening, America is in retreat. The tide of America is retreating in the
region. And they are now going to fill the gap.
HANNITY: All
right, let me, Charles --KRAUTHAMMER:
That's why all of this is happening. HANNITY:
Charles, a superb analysis. But here's what's happened. And you see the world
is burning. And they are against America and our ambassador killed, two U.S.
Navy SEALs killed. I will get to this later. What are we going to do about it? But
they apologize. They say that Egypt is still our ally, run by the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Muslim Brotherhood gets $2 billion of our taxpayer dollars.
This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood, Charles. "Allah is our
objective. The prophet our leader, the Koran our law. Jihad our way, dying in
the way of Allah our highest hope." Why would we give them $2 billion?
Why?! KRAUTHAMMER:
Well, look, I don't think the issue right now is foreign aid. If Morsi, the
president of Egypt, doesn't cooperate, doesn't support our embassies, protect
our embassies and doesn't honor the peace treaty with Israel, there is already
trouble in the Sayonite (ph). Then I think you withdraw the aid. HANNITY: Not exactly. KRAUTHAMMER: That
means the tide of American power is receding. And the reason that American
interests, embassies, schools, businesses are aflame throughout the Middle East
from Tunis all the way to South Asia is because things don't happen in a
vacuum. And when you withdraw the power and the influence of the strongest
country on earth from a region, the vacuum will be filled. HANNITY: Great point. KRAUTHAMMER: What we
are seeing now is the Salafists, the Islamist, understanding this is their
opening, America is in retreat. The tide of America is retreating in the
region. And they are now going to fill the gap. HANNITY: All right, let me, Charles --KRAUTHAMMER: That's
why all of this is happening. HANNITY:
Charles, a superb analysis. But here's what's happened. And you see the world
is burning. And they are against America and our ambassador killed, two U.S.
Navy SEALs killed. I will get to this later. What are we going to do about it? But
they apologize. They say that Egypt is still our ally, run by the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Muslim Brotherhood gets $2 billion of our taxpayer dollars.
This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood, Charles. "Allah is our
objective. The prophet our leader, the Koran our law. Jihad our way, dying in
the way of Allah our highest hope." Why would we give them $2 billion?
Why?! KRAUTHAMMER:
Well, look, I don't think the issue right now is foreign aid. If Morsi, the
president of Egypt, doesn't cooperate, doesn't support our embassies, protect
our embassies and doesn't honor the peace treaty with Israel, there is already
trouble in the Sayonite (ph). Then I think you withdraw the aid. You got to be
very careful, now. The vacuum is already been created. The trouble is already
at hand. American enemies are right on the move, everywhere as we can see.
Right now, our hand is very much weakened because of the three years of Obama
policy. At this point, you don't want to make it worse by -- you know, a move
that is reactive and too fast. You withdraw all of our aid today, and we have
no leverage. What you do is you portion it out depending on how they act. HANNITY: All right,
Charles. KRAUTHAMMER:
But the problem is this, pro-American elements in the region, look around.
There is no America anymore. I will give you one example. Does anybody care
about what we think about Syria? The major country in Mesopotamia. Does anybody
ask what Obama's view? No. They want to know what the Russians are doing, the
Iranians and Hezbollah. These are the active players. And that's what happens
when America withdraws its power and its influence. We become irrelevant. HANNITY: Charles, I --
dead-on analysis. Thank you so much for being with us. We need this kind of
perspective during this, what is a worldwide crisis now. Thank you for being
with us. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2012/09/17/krauthammer-tide-american-power-receding#ixzz26pJgKNm4
THE U.S. Constitution is under attack by the Obama White
House!!!!!!!!!! Act now-before it is too late.
No comments:
Post a Comment